Science cannot be legislated. Science is not determined by opinion polls and petitions. South Dakota can outlaw global warming if it wishes, but such decisions mean as much to science as arguments by ornithologists mean to birds [emphasis added].That old analogy about the Ostrich with its head stuck in the sand has never seemed more appropriate.
Popular Posts
-
If you live in the Bay area, you're probably well acquainted with, the Berkley based , Omega Too . For the rest of you, they're the... -
Trawling for Alaska pollack south of the Pribilof Islands in the Bering Sea at a depth of 2,100 feet, the Seattle-based catcher-processor K... -
Charlie Vandergaw, a 70-year-old retired teacher, has been befriending bears (both black and grizzly) on his remote homestead north of Anch...
-
What follows is a list of active and inactive North American (Canada to Panama) bird blogs that are personally known to me. There are certai...
-
I'm not sure what's cooler, the concept { every monday, wear something different and stand on something }, the art direction or the ... -
Y ahora con Tristan Scott: Y ahora nuestros chicos de manera conjunta: ... -
La foto delos 15, no mentiras la del documento de identidad, o certificado de votaciones Esta si es de colección, modelando para Dylan Ross...
-
Selected stories about culled from the world's newspapers and other news outlets, particularly as it relates to wild birds, as gathered ...
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Denying Climate Change Science
The South Dakota House of Representatives passed HCR 1009 last week, a resolution calling for the "balanced teaching of global warming in the public schools of South Dakota." Writing in the Huffington Post, Steve Martin offered this assessment:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment