Science cannot be legislated. Science is not determined by opinion polls and petitions. South Dakota can outlaw global warming if it wishes, but such decisions mean as much to science as arguments by ornithologists mean to birds [emphasis added].That old analogy about the Ostrich with its head stuck in the sand has never seemed more appropriate.
Popular Posts
-
Y ahora con Tristan Scott: Y ahora nuestros chicos de manera conjunta: ...
-
La foto delos 15, no mentiras la del documento de identidad, o certificado de votaciones Esta si es de colección, modelando para Dylan Ross...
-
Bueno y ahora un recorrido especial (que bueno hacerlo en la piel de los chicos) por la historia fotográfica de ELIJAH y MILO.. Un amigo ...
-
If you live in the Bay area, you're probably well acquainted with, the Berkley based , Omega Too . For the rest of you, they're the...
-
Eric Martsolf is an actor and singer who starred as Ethan Winthrop in the American soap Passions up until 2008. He is now playing the role o...
-
Selected stories about culled from the world's newspapers and other news outlets, particularly as it relates to wild birds, as gathered ...
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Denying Climate Change Science
The South Dakota House of Representatives passed HCR 1009 last week, a resolution calling for the "balanced teaching of global warming in the public schools of South Dakota." Writing in the Huffington Post, Steve Martin offered this assessment:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment